Flying contributes significantly to the global climate crisis and in a business as usual scenario is expected to steadily grow in the following decades (Wilde, 2019). In its last Special Report (IPCC, 2018), the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, a body of the United Nations with the mission of providing an objective view of the climate crisis and whose Summaries to policymakers are subject to line-by-line approval by all participating governments, called for a reduction of global net anthropogenic CO2 emissions by about 45% from 2010 levels by 2030, reaching net zero around 2050. This reduction path, which relies on massive use of Carbon Dioxide Removal (CDR) technologies that are still to be invented for scalable use, would only have a probability of 50% to stay below a warming of 1.5°C (a level for which e.g. all coral reefs will disappear and highly probable coastal flooding will be severe and widespread). The only scenario developed by IPCC (2018: 16) that makes only use of afforestation as CDR assumes that CO2 emissions are reduced by 58% from 2010 levels by 2030 and to zero by 2050 while remaining negative for the whole century. In a more recent study published in Nature Climate Changethe authors conclude that CO2 emissions must be reduced to net zero by 2030 in order to stay below the more dangerous temperature increase of 2°C (Lamontagne et al, 2019).

Scientists for Future(#S4F) are already supporting the Fridays For Futuremovement (#FFF) of school children requesting world governments to implement the IPCC recommendations. Extinction Rebellion, a social-science based movement applying non-violent, disruptive civil disobedience, is addressing the scenario of Montagne and colleagues (2019) asking for zero net emissions by 2025/30 and spreads worldwide finding adherents in all social classes and age groups. Which contribution can organizational scientists offer to confront climate disruption?We can offer our knowledge of organizational and institutional dynamics but also the symbolic power of behavioral changes prefiguring a zero carbon world as other (climate) scientists are already doing (Academics Fly Less, @flyingless; #sabbicycle). Are we ready for a movement of Organizational Scientists for Future (#OS4F & #OS4XR)?

The signatories of this pledge will reach the location of this year’s EGOS Colloquium in Edinburgh and/or of next year’s in Hamburg by train, coach, bike or another low-carbon alternative to flying.

Initiators

Helen Etchanchu, Giuseppe Delmestri

To sign the pledge write an email to: h.etchanchu@montpellier-bs.com or  giuseppe.delmestri@wu.ac.at

Signatories‘ names are published here

Cited literature

IPCC, 2018. Global warming of 1.5° C. Summary for Policymakers. https://www.ipcc.ch/sr15/

Lamontagne, Reed, Marangoni, Keller, Garner. 2019. Robust abatement pathways to tolerable climate futures require immediate global action. Nature Climate Change, 9/4: 290-294.

Wilde, P. 2019. Calling Upon Universities and Professional Associations to Greatly Reduce Flying. Further Information and Frequently Asked Questions. https://academicflyingblog.wordpress.com